By GetRecruited

Introduction
There are 1,361 men's college soccer programs in the United States. A handful — the perennial College Cup contenders — get the coverage. The other thirteen-hundred-plus rarely make a highlight reel, and they're where the overwhelming majority of recruiting actually happens.
This report is a map of that full field. Pulling GetRecruited's data on every one of those programs, it breaks down how men's college soccer is organized — division, geography, cost, academics, resources, and recent form. It won't tell you where a particular player belongs. What it does is replace guesswork with a clear picture, so the decisions that follow — which programs to research, which coaches to contact, which campuses to visit — rest on something solid.
GetRecruited is a complete college recruiting system for high school athletes and their families. Tell us your sport and grad year, and we'll build a sequenced recruiting plan for your athlete.
Landscape
Only one program in six is D1.
Across five divisions, men's soccer tilts hard away from D1. Just 16% of programs compete there. The largest division by a wide margin is D3 at 30%, JUCO alone outnumbers D1, and all told roughly 84% of the sport plays outside D1. The men's soccer directory carries all 1,361 and lets you filter by division. Here we map what each one actually changes.
Division decides more than how good the soccer is — it decides the money. D1 and D2 hand out partial athletic scholarships, split across a big roster, so even there a full ride is rare. D3 offers no athletic money at all; NAIA and JUCO each set their own rules. And because D3 is the largest division, the most common men's program is one that can't put up a single athletic scholarship.
The sport is also geographically lopsided. Five states — California (148), New York (116), Pennsylvania (95), Illinois (73), and Massachusetts (57) — account for 36% of all men's soccer programs, and California alone holds 11% of them.
That clustering shapes the logistics of recruiting. Live near one of those hubs and dozens of programs sit within a short drive, which keeps visits and regional showcases manageable. Live somewhere thinner and the search has to reach into neighboring states and the events where many programs scout at once — more planning per mile. The map below shows where the programs concentrate.
Roster size
Roster spots aren't the scarce part.
The first thing a recruit wants to know about a program is simple: will it have room in my class? Men's squads run large — around 33 players on average — and a four-year roster turns over roughly a quarter of itself each year. Totaled across the five divisions, the sport opens on the order of 13,800 roster spots a season. Places to play aren't scarce; the hard part is finding the ones where level, academics, and cost all fit at once.
Per program, the turnover is fairly even across the four-year divisions: D1 through NAIA each bring in eight to ten newcomers a year. What stands out in men's soccer is sheer roster size — D2 and NAIA squads average 38 to 40 players. JUCO runs smaller, near 28, but on a two-year clock it reloads about half the team annually, closer to fourteen new players each fall.
| Division | Programs | Avg roster | Open spots, total | Open spots, pr. program |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 213 | 31.8 | 1,695/year | 8.0/year |
| D2 | 205 | 38.7 | 1,981/year | 9.7/year |
| D3 | 409 | 33.5 | 3,421/year | 8.4/year |
| NAIA | 194 | 40.5 | 1,965/year | 10.1/year |
| JUCO | 340 | 27.7 | 4,703/year | 13.8/year |
Averages bury the useful detail, though. Within a single division, rosters swing wildly: some D2 and NAIA programs carry 20, others well past 100. A bloated roster isn't extra opportunity — it's more bodies fighting for the same minutes, sometimes a keep-everyone model rather than a recruited core. The number worth checking is a specific program's roster against the size of its last recruiting class. That pairing says far more than any divisional average.
Roster size, by division
| Program | Roster |
|---|---|
| Gardner-Webb University Big South Conference | 69 |
| Mercyhurst University Northeast Conference | 66 |
| Mount St. Mary's University Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference | 47 |
| University of Evansville Missouri Valley Conference | 46 |
| University of California-Santa Barbara Big West Conference | 45 |
| University of Central Arkansas Atlantic Sun Conference | 44 |
| University of South Carolina-Upstate Big South Conference | 43 |
| University of California-Berkeley Atlantic Coast Conference | 42 |
| Bellarmine University Atlantic Sun Conference | 42 |
| Bryant University America East Conference | 42 |
Academics
A higher division doesn't mean a better degree.
Start with the graduation rate — the share of students who finish a degree. Men's D1 soccer schools graduate an average 71%; D3 sits just behind at 63%, even though it offers no athletic money. D2 (52%), NAIA (45%), and JUCO (36%) fall well short, and earnings and first-year retention track the same way. Academic quality, in other words, doesn't climb step-by-step with the athletic tier — it pools in D1 and D3. For a family that weighs the degree as heavily as the soccer, those are the two divisions to start with.
The ceiling proves it. The highest-earning men's soccer program in the country is Caltech, a D3; MIT and Carnegie Mellon, also D3, top Stanford and Harvard. Still, the division is only a first filter — inside any one, graduation runs from under a fifth of students to nearly all of them. A 70%-plus graduation rate is common at D1 (more than half of programs) and D3 (about a third), and scarce anywhere else. The table ranks each division's strongest academic programs on selectivity, graduation, and earnings; the figure that should steer you is the school's, not the division's.
Strongest academics, by division
| Program | Acceptance rate | Graduation rate | Median earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University The Ivy League | 4% | 98% | $99,572 |
| University of Pennsylvania The Ivy League | 5% | 97% | $90,555 |
| Princeton University The Ivy League | 5% | 98% | $87,815 |
| Stanford University Atlantic Coast Conference | 4% | 92% | $102,887 |
| Columbia University in the City of New York The Ivy League | 4% | 96% | $88,535 |
| Duke University Atlantic Coast Conference | 6% | 97% | $85,792 |
| Yale University The Ivy League | 4% | 96% | $81,765 |
| Cornell University The Ivy League | 9% | 95% | $87,830 |
| Dartmouth College The Ivy League | 5% | 96% | $82,541 |
| Brown University The Ivy League | 5% | 96% | $79,131 |
Cost
Public or private matters more than the division.
Cost quietly sets the edges of a search — the programs that are realistic, and the ones that aren't. Start with the right number: not the published sticker price, but the net price, what a family actually pays after the average grant and scholarship aid. And the lever that moves it most isn't division. It's ownership. Public colleges average about $11,900 a year; private ones about $26,100 — better than double, a wider gap than anything the divisions show.
JUCO's low average — roughly $9,400 — is really just that: almost every junior-college program is a public school. The pattern holds in every division, where the state school usually undercuts the private one down the road, D1 or D3 alike. Real prices run from under $2,000 a year at the cheapest public colleges to nearly $60,000 at the priciest privates. The table sets each division's public and private averages side by side — the public figure stays low top to bottom.
Average net price per year, after grant and scholarship aid
There's a quiet assumption that the cheap option is the lesser one — that a low price buys a weaker school. For a lot of families that fear quietly shrinks the list, crossing off affordable programs before anyone looks closely. The programs below are the counter-evidence. Each pairs one of the lowest net prices in its division with genuinely strong academics, and nearly all of them are public. That's the sweet spot a cost-conscious search is looking for — and a smart place to start one.
Lowest net price, by division
| Program | Net price | Graduation rate |
|---|---|---|
| The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Ohio Valley Conference | $5,282 | 51% |
| California State University-Bakersfield Big West Conference | $6,489 | 50% |
| California State University-Fullerton Big West Conference | $7,064 | 70% |
| California State University-Northridge Big West Conference | $7,536 | 57% |
| Marshall University Sun Belt Conference | $8,076 | 51% |
| Utah Valley University Western Athletic Conference | $8,721 | 40% |
| Northern Kentucky University Horizon League | $9,211 | 54% |
| California State University-Sacramento Big West Conference | $10,110 | 56% |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Atlantic Coast Conference | $10,154 | 91% |
| Florida Atlantic University American Conference | $10,225 | 63% |
The directory shows the landscape. GetRecruited turns it into a sequenced plan for your sport, grad year, academic profile, outreach, visits, and offers.
Resources
On scholarships, NAIA beats D2.
Money is the least visible thing on a recruiting visit and one of the most telling. What a program spends in a year — coaching, travel, facilities, and the scholarships it hands players — marks the scale of the operation a recruit would join, even if it buys him no extra minutes on the field. In men's soccer that scale is steeply top-heavy: the average D1 program runs on about $1.25 million a year, while a D3 program gets by on barely an eighth of that.
Drop below D1 and the money stops tracking the division ladder — and on scholarships, NAIA actually out-funds D2. The average NAIA program puts about $408,000 toward player scholarships against D2's $307,000, and per roster spot it's the same: roughly $9,800 at NAIA versus $8,100 at D2. D3, by rule, offers none. So a recruit chasing scholarship money shouldn't assume D2 sits above NAIA — in men's soccer it's often the other way around.
Average spending per year, by division
Total scholarship dollars only tell half the story — spread across a big roster, they thin out fast. Divide a program's aid by its roster and the picture sharpens: a D1 program puts roughly $23,500 behind each player, several times what any other division manages. NAIA edges D2 here too — about $9,800 a spot to $8,100 — while JUCO sits near $2,900 and D3, by rule, at zero. It's a rough figure, not a per-player promise, but it's the closest thing to how far a program's scholarship money actually stretches.
Average athletic aid per roster spot, by division
These are the heaviest spenders in each division — the programs putting the most into their men's soccer each year. Total spend is the whole operation; the scholarship column shows how much of it reaches players directly, the line between a facilities-and-travel budget and a scholarship-first one. At the D1 top, Clemson and Washington clear $3 million a year.
Highest total spend, by division
| Program | Total spend | Scholarships |
|---|---|---|
| Clemson University Atlantic Coast Conference | $3,583,872 | $1,029,513 |
| University of Washington-Seattle Campus Big Ten Conference | $3,121,941 | $1,209,337 |
| Marshall University Sun Belt Conference | $3,007,967 | $669,107 |
| Wake Forest University Atlantic Coast Conference | $2,929,818 | $1,708,223 |
| University of Maryland-College Park Big Ten Conference | $2,862,342 | $944,685 |
| Southern Methodist University Atlantic Coast Conference | $2,857,263 | $2,006,971 |
| University of Notre Dame Atlantic Coast Conference | $2,749,910 | $1,456,042 |
| Stanford University Atlantic Coast Conference | $2,615,880 | $1,233,354 |
| Syracuse University Atlantic Coast Conference | $2,572,355 | $1,380,941 |
| Providence College BIG EAST Conference | $2,570,147 | $1,363,731 |
For a recruit, those top-end budgets aren't the point. What matters is how a program stacks up against its realistic peers — a well-funded program at his own level tells him more than the gap to the top ever will. Read resources as one signal among several; roster, location, academics, and cost still decide fit.
Performance
Who's winning, rising, and sliding.
Once you're sizing up specific programs, recent results are worth a look — both where a team sits now and which way it's moving. Three cuts follow: the strongest records this season, the programs climbing fastest, and the ones falling off.
Start with the simplest measure: winning. These are the best records of the 2025-26 season, and the goal-margin column shows how comfortably — outscoring opponents by three a night is a different kind of strong than scraping one-goal results.
Strongest 25-26 records
| Program | 25-26 record | Win rate | Goal margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Princeton University The Ivy League | 15-2-2 | 84.2% | +1.42/game |
| Bryant University America East Conference | 17-2-3 | 84.1% | +1.37/game |
| University of Vermont America East Conference | 14-1-5 | 82.5% | +1.31/game |
| Furman University Southern Conference | 16-2-5 | 80.4% | +1.28/game |
| High Point University Big South Conference | 14-2-4 | 80.0% | +1.70/game |
A current record is a snapshot; the trend is the story. These programs gained the most win percentage between 2021-22 and 2025-26 — usually the mark of a staff that has found something, and of a roster still being built, which can open a real door for a newcomer.
Climbing fastest
| Program | Win rate 21-22 | Win rate 25-26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindenwood University Ohio Valley Conference | 46.9% | 76.2% | +29.3 |
| Stonehill College Northeast Conference | 38.2% | 36.1% | -2.1 |
| Queens University of Charlotte Atlantic Sun Conference | 50.0% | 47.1% | -2.9 |
| University of Southern Indiana Ohio Valley Conference | 37.5% | 26.5% | -11.0 |
And the reverse: the programs that have given back the most ground over those four years. A slide scares recruits off, but read it closely — a rebuild often means open spots and a coach who needs players, provided you understand what's behind the drop.
Sliding fastest
| Program | Win rate 21-22 | Win rate 25-26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern Indiana Ohio Valley Conference | 37.5% | 26.5% | -11.0 |
| Queens University of Charlotte Atlantic Sun Conference | 50.0% | 47.1% | -2.9 |
| Stonehill College Northeast Conference | 38.2% | 36.1% | -2.1 |
| Lindenwood University Ohio Valley Conference | 46.9% | 76.2% | +29.3 |
Conclusion
For a men's soccer recruit, the most useful takeaway is also the most freeing: the letter beside a program settles less than it seems. It doesn't fix the academics — D3 routinely beats D2. It doesn't fix the cost — a public school usually wins, in any division. It doesn't fix the scholarship money — NAIA can top D2. And it doesn't even fix the level for long, since results drift from one season to the next.
So the move isn't to rank by tier and email the top of the list. It's to widen the net past the names you already know, then weigh each program on its own numbers — the roster and its last recruiting class, the graduation rate and net price, the aid it actually pays out, the way its results are heading. That's more work than starting from a ranking. It's also the only way the shortlist ends up built around your athlete instead of around a label.
This report shows how the sport is laid out — where programs are, what they cost, how they perform, where the academic fit is. The next move is narrowing it to a real shortlist and a sequence: the programs to target, the coaches to email, the visits worth taking. That's the plan GetRecruited builds with you.
Methodology
Nothing here is estimated or scraped. Cost, graduation, earnings, and admissions figures come from the U.S. Department of Education's College Scorecard and IPEDS. Roster and program-finance figures come from the Department's Equity in Athletics (EADA) filings, which every college that fields a team must submit by law. Competitive results come from the NCAA's own statistics archive. Together they cover all 1,361 men's soccer programs, in every division.
The academic, cost, and resource scores are computed within each sport-gender-division group, so every comparison is like-for-like — a D3 program judged on the D3 field, not held up against a power-conference D1's spending. Roster and financial figures reflect each school's latest federal filing (2024-25); results run through 2025-26, and we refresh the data as new official numbers post.
U.S. Department of Education. Athletic participation and program finances, filed annually by every college.
U.S. Department of Education. Cost, graduation, earnings, and admissions data.
Official season records and results for NCAA D1, D2, and D3.