By GetRecruited

Introduction
The version of men's college volleyball most families picture is a West Coast one: a few national powers, packed gyms in California, and the sense that a player who isn't near the Pacific is already a step behind. It's an easy picture to form. The teams that win titles do cluster out West, and the sport is small enough that those names take up most of the available oxygen.
Count the programs and the picture rearranges. There are 300 men's volleyball teams playing across 5 divisions and 33 states. The state with the most of them isn't California — it's New York, with 42. California comes next at 38, then Pennsylvania (29), Illinois (22), and Massachusetts (18). For a sport tied to the coast in the popular imagination, its programs are spread surprisingly far inland and up the Eastern Seaboard.
That matters for how a family reads the field. The teams you can name from memory are real, but they're a sliver of where the sport is actually played and recruited. This report lays out all 300 — how they divide by division, how many roster spots open in a normal year, what the degrees lead to, and what families end up paying — so the list you build comes from the full field rather than the part that gets televised.
Seeing that 300 programs exist is one thing; knowing which ones match a player's level, grades, and what a family can spend is the work that follows. A recruiting plan turns this map into a focused list of programs worth contacting, in the right order. That's where the next step lives.
Landscape
The sport's center of gravity is Division III.
Assume Division I is the core of men's volleyball and the numbers will surprise you — it's the smallest tier in the sport. D1 has only 31 programs, about one in ten. The biggest tier by a wide margin is Division III, with 134 programs, or 45% of everything. The NAIA — a separate national association of mostly smaller four-year colleges — adds 61 (20%), Division II holds 43 (14%), and the two-year junior colleges account for the last 31 (10%).
So nearly half of all men's volleyball happens at the D3 level, where no athletic scholarships exist but the choice of schools is deepest. Another fifth sits in the NAIA, which does fund athletes under its own rules. A list built only of D1 names leaves out roughly nine of every ten programs in the country.
For a recruit, that breadth is the opening. The real question is rarely whether a program exists at a given level — it's which of these five tiers, each with its own approach to aid and admissions, fits what a family actually wants out of college.
The geography backs up the point. The five states with the most programs — New York (42), California (38), Pennsylvania (29), Illinois (22), and Massachusetts (18) — together hold about half of every men's volleyball program in the country, and only one of them touches the West Coast. New Jersey (16), Virginia (14), and Indiana (12) come close behind. The sport tracks where four-year colleges are thickest on the ground.
There's a practical upside in that for families in the Northeast and around the Great Lakes: dozens of programs sit within a few hours of one another, which makes weekend visits and showcase trips far easier to string together than a Pacific-only sport would allow. The map below shows how the 300 fall, state by state.
Roster size
Small squads, but a new class lands each fall.
Men's volleyball squads are lean. Across the sport the average roster is 18.3 players, and it barely moves by level: 20.5 at D1, 20.1 in the NAIA, 19.2 at D2, 16.9 at D3, and 16.7 at junior college. That's a fraction of a football or even a soccer roster, which can make a team look like it has no room for a newcomer.
But a roster count is a photo of today, not a tally of who's leaving. Seniors graduate every spring and a new class arrives every fall. We estimate yearly openings by dividing a division's average roster by four — by two at junior college, where most players move on after two seasons. That works out to roughly 5.1 spots opening per D1 program a year, 5 per NAIA program, 4.8 at D2, 4.2 at D3, and 8.4 at each JUCO team.
Total those across every team and the field looks far more open. D3 turns over an estimated 567 spots a year — the most of any tier, simply because it has the most teams. The NAIA generates about 307, junior college 260, D2 206, and D1 159. These are estimates, not guarantees. What's worth holding onto is the order: the tier opening the most spots each year is the one most families skip past.
| Division | Programs | Avg roster | Open spots, total | Open spots, pr. program |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 31 | 20.5 | 159/year | 5.1/year |
| D2 | 43 | 19.2 | 206/year | 4.8/year |
| D3 | 134 | 16.9 | 567/year | 4.2/year |
| NAIA | 61 | 20.1 | 307/year | 5.0/year |
| JUCO | 31 | 16.7 | 260/year | 8.4/year |
The level averages hide a real spread. Within a single tier, rosters run from squads in the 30s and beyond (Park at 53 in the NAIA, St. Joseph's at 39 in D3) down to lean ones carrying eight or nine (Kentucky State at D2, Emerson at D3). A bigger roster is more players competing for the same spots on the floor, not extra opportunity — toggle between deepest and leanest, then weigh a program's size against the class it's bringing in.
Roster size, by division
| Program | Roster |
|---|---|
| Pepperdine University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 27 |
| Loyola University Chicago Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 25 |
| California State University-Long Beach Big West Conference | 24 |
| California State University-Northridge Big West Conference | 24 |
| Sacred Heart University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 23 |
| Ball State University Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 23 |
| George Mason University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 23 |
| University of California-Los Angeles Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 22 |
| University of California-San Diego Big West Conference | 22 |
| University of California-Santa Barbara Big West Conference | 22 |
Academics
Hard-earned degrees sit well under the D1 net.
It's natural to read division as a stand-in for academic quality — to assume the best degrees sit at D1 and everything beneath it is a notch down. Graduation rates, meaning the share of students who finish their degree, don't fall in that order. D1 leads at 71%, but D3 is next at 60%, ahead of D2 (48%), the NAIA (46%), and junior college (38%). First-year retention — how many students come back for a second year — follows the same shape: 84% at D1, 76% at D3, 70% at D2.
The academic standouts make it plainer. The strongest degrees in men's volleyball aren't stacked at D1; they're scattered across the tiers. At D1, Harvard graduates 98% of its students with graduates earning a median $99,572 six years after they enroll — that figure is what a typical graduate is making at that point — and Princeton matches the 98% graduation rate at $87,815. But D3 has its own peak: MIT graduates 96% and its alumni earn $131,633, the highest earnings figure anywhere in this dataset, with NYU close behind at 88% and $64,543.
The pattern holds past the marquee names. At D2, Rockhurst graduates 74% of its students with $61,371 in early-career earnings; in the NAIA, Dordt also hits a 74% graduation rate. The point for a family is steady: a program's division tells you how its volleyball is run, not how good its classrooms are. Weigh each school on its own academic numbers.
Strongest academics, by division
| Program | Acceptance rate | Graduation rate | Median earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 4% | 98% | $99,572 |
| Stanford University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 4% | 92% | $102,887 |
| Princeton University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 5% | 98% | $87,815 |
| University of Southern California Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 10% | 92% | $74,461 |
| University of California-Los Angeles Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 9% | 93% | $59,063 |
| University of California-San Diego Big West Conference | 27% | 86% | $65,669 |
| University of California-Irvine Big West Conference | 29% | 87% | $56,210 |
| Pepperdine University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 63% | 83% | $64,934 |
| University of California-Santa Barbara Big West Conference | 33% | 83% | $56,852 |
| New Jersey Institute of Technology Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 65% | 73% | $69,591 |
Cost
The widest price gap is public against private.
What a family pays is the net price — the yearly cost left after grants and aid come off, not the published sticker number. And the strongest predictor of that figure isn't the division; it's whether a school is public or private. Across men's volleyball, public schools average $11,375 a year after aid and private schools average $25,007. That $13,632 spread is wider than the distance between any two divisions.
Go division by division and the tiers bunch up: D1 averages $23,085, D3 $23,843, D2 $20,397, and the NAIA $22,714 — all within a few thousand dollars of each other. Junior college stands apart at $8,567, comfortably the cheapest route in the sport. But the public-private split reappears inside almost every tier. D1 publics average $15,474 against $30,220 for D1 privates; even at D3 the range runs from $12,485 at public schools to $26,197 at private ones.
So a state university, whether it plays D1 or D3, will usually leave a family with a smaller bill than a private college in the same division. The letter on the jersey says very little about the invoice.
Average net price per year, after grant and scholarship aid
A low net price isn't the lesser option — these are the cheapest programs after aid in each tier, and at D1 every one is public, led by Cal State Northridge at $7,536 and Northern Kentucky at $9,211. The CUNY schools anchor D3 in the $4,000 range, with Lehman at $3,961, and junior college runs cheaper still (Middlesex at $2,314). Read the price column against graduation rate, since the best value keeps both numbers strong — and none of these carry the sport's loudest names.
Lowest net price, by division
| Program | Net price | Graduation rate |
|---|---|---|
| California State University-Northridge Big West Conference | $7,536 | 57% |
| Northern Kentucky University Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $9,211 | 54% |
| California State University-Long Beach Big West Conference | $10,607 | 69% |
| University of Maryland Eastern Shore Northeast Conference | $13,311 | 35% |
| Ball State University Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $13,599 | 62% |
| University of California-San Diego Big West Conference | $14,047 | 86% |
| University of California-Los Angeles Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $14,512 | 93% |
| Purdue University Fort Wayne Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $14,735 | 36% |
| Princeton University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $15,313 | 98% |
| University of California-Irvine Big West Conference | $15,889 | 87% |
Two schools in the same division can sit $20,000 a year apart on net price. A recruiting plan lets a family sort programs by what they'd actually pay alongside level and fit — so the offer that lands senior year is one you can afford to accept. The time to map the cost is early.
Resources
How far an offer stretches depends on the tier.
Athletic spending in men's volleyball comes in two parts: scholarship dollars paid to players, and everything else — coaching, travel, facilities, and day-to-day operations. The total swings hard by division. D1 programs spend an average of $992,435 a year, splitting it into $465,015 of scholarships and $527,420 of other costs. The rest of the sport runs on far less: the NAIA averages $349,088 in total spend, D2 $254,757, D3 $113,868, and junior college $110,550.
D3 is its own case. NCAA rules bar Division III from awarding any athletic scholarships, so its entire $113,868 average goes to coaching, travel, and operations. Aid at a D3 program comes through academic and need-based grants, never an athletic award — the one tier where the money in play has nothing to do with how a player performs on the court.
Average spending per year, by division
For a recruit, total spend is the wrong figure anyway. What counts is how much athletic aid lands on each roster spot — the scholarship pool divided across the team. On that measure the tiers shuffle. D1 leads at $22,171 per roster spot, well clear of the rest. But the NAIA comes second at $10,533, ahead of D2's $7,432 — so a scholarship offer from an NAIA school can go further than one from a D2 program. Junior college sits lowest at $2,021 per spot, and D3 offers no athletic aid at all.
For a family weighing two offers, that reordering is the headline worth keeping: the tier with the second-deepest aid per athlete isn't D2 — it's the NAIA, the association many recruits never look at.
Average athletic aid per roster spot, by division
These are the heaviest spenders in each tier. Total spend is the whole operation — coaching, travel, facilities; the scholarship column shows how much reaches players as athletic aid. UCLA tops D1 and the sport at $2,454,572 a year, though only $794,354 of that is scholarships — most runs through travel and facilities, while USC nearby pours most of its budget into aid. At D3, where no athletic aid is allowed by rule, the scholarship column is blank by design.
Highest total spend, by division
| Program | Total spend | Scholarships |
|---|---|---|
| University of California-Los Angeles Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $2,454,572 | $794,354 |
| Brigham Young University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $2,184,689 | $379,697 |
| California State University-Long Beach Big West Conference | $1,968,622 | $302,476 |
| University of Southern California Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $1,709,180 | $1,213,928 |
| Pepperdine University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $1,578,564 | $780,909 |
| Ohio State University-Main Campus Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $1,498,024 | $663,782 |
| University of Hawaii at Manoa Big West Conference | $1,408,963 | $419,491 |
| Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | $1,228,606 | $646,669 |
| Stanford University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | $1,222,045 | $704,773 |
| University of California-Santa Barbara Big West Conference | $1,033,195 | $240,512 |
None of these spending figures should decide where a recruit ends up. A million-dollar budget and a hundred-thousand-dollar one can each produce four good years — or four frustrating ones. Spend describes how a program runs; it can't tell a family where a player will be developed, get real court time, and finish a degree he's glad to have.
Treat the budget as background, then set it next to the things money can't show: the coach a player would actually work with, the academic match, the distance home, and the price a family can carry without strain.
Performance
Contenders, risers, and the teams losing ground.
A record tells you where a program stands today; the trend across five seasons tells you which way it's moving — often the more useful read for a recruit looking a year or two ahead. We track each team two ways: win percentage, the share of matches won, and hitting percentage, volleyball's standard efficiency stat (kills minus errors, divided by total attempts). These figures cover NCAA Divisions I through III; the NAIA and junior college don't feed into the same archive.
A program on the rise is recruiting hard and giving younger players room to develop; one on the way down may be mid-transition. Reading both the standing and the direction matters — a team climbing fast can be a better landing spot than a former power that's drifting.
By this season's record and hitting efficiency, these are the strongest programs in each division:
Strongest 25-26 records
| Program | 25-26 record | Win percentage | Hitting |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of California-Los Angeles Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 29-2 | 93.5% | .380 |
| University of Hawaii at Manoa Big West Conference | 30-5 | 85.7% | .367 |
| Ball State University Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 26-5 | 83.9% | .377 |
| California State University-Long Beach Big West Conference | 25-5 | 83.3% | .342 |
| Pepperdine University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 24-7 | 77.4% | .374 |
Measured by the gain in win percentage from the 21-22 season to 25-26, these programs have improved the most:
Climbing fastest
| Program | Win rate 21-22 | Win rate 25-26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindenwood University Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 36.4% | 74.1% | +37.7 |
| Brigham Young University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 32.0% | 63.6% | +31.6 |
| University of California-Irvine Big West Conference | 40.7% | 70.0% | +29.3 |
| Fairleigh Dickinson University-Metropolitan Campus Northeast Conference | 30.4% | 51.9% | +21.5 |
| George Mason University Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 46.4% | 66.7% | +20.3 |
Over those same five seasons, these programs have given back the most ground in win percentage:
Sliding fastest
| Program | Win rate 21-22 | Win rate 25-26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of California-Santa Barbara Big West Conference | 67.9% | 53.8% | −14.1 |
| Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 85.2% | 73.3% | −11.9 |
| Stanford University Mountain Pacific Sports Federation (Men’s Volleyball) | 50.0% | 42.3% | −7.7 |
| Purdue University Fort Wayne Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association | 56.7% | 50.0% | −6.7 |
| University of California-San Diego Big West Conference | 54.2% | 48.1% | −6.1 |
Conclusion
Men's college volleyball is smaller than its biggest names imply and far wider than its coastal billing. Three hundred programs sit across five divisions, concentrated as much in New York and Pennsylvania as in California, with most of them — and most of the yearly openings — in the tiers families rarely scan.
The data leans the same way in every section. Strong degrees show up at D3 as often as D1. The bill turns on public versus private more than on the level. NAIA aid can out-reach D2's. And the programs that fit best seldom carry the largest budgets. The task for a family isn't deciding whether a player belongs in this sport somewhere — it's working out which of these 300 places matches his level, his grades, and what the family can pay.
That's the distance between a map and a plan: taking a field of programs that merely exist and narrowing it to the short list worth your time, your visits, and a player's emails.
You've seen the full field — every division, the actual costs, the openings, and which way each program is trending. The next move is a recruiting plan that narrows these 300 down to the ones matching a player's level, academics, and budget, and lays out who to contact and when. There's still time to act on it.
Methodology
Roster sizes and program finances — scholarship dollars, other operating costs, and total spend — come from the Equity in Athletics Data Analysis (EADA) reports that every college files with the U.S. Department of Education. Cost, graduation rates, first-year retention, post-college earnings, and acceptance rates come from the College Scorecard and IPEDS, the federal datasets on college outcomes. Performance figures — win percentage and hitting efficiency, and their five-season trends — come from NCAA Statistics, which covers Divisions I through III only; NAIA and junior-college programs aren't in that archive.
Every score and ranking is computed inside men's volleyball specifically — program against program, division against division — so the comparisons reflect this sport, not athletics at large. Estimated yearly openings divide each division's average roster by four, and by two for junior college, to approximate normal class turnover; they're projections, not promises. Figures are current as of the 2025-26 reporting cycle.
U.S. Department of Education. Athletic participation and program finances, filed annually by every college.
U.S. Department of Education. Cost, graduation, earnings, and admissions data.
Official season records and results for NCAA D1, D2, and D3.